CAIIB BRBL Module B UNIT 9 MCQ – Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

CAIIB BRBL Module B UNIT 9 MCQ – Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Understand India’s Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: cheques, bills, notes, and solved questions for CAIIB BRBL exam preparation.

Question 1: Under Section 31 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, what is the primary duty of a drawee bank when it possesses sufficient funds of the drawer properly applicable to the payment of a cheque?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: C. To pay the cheque when duly required to do so. Section 31 mandates that a drawee bank, holding adequate and available funds of the drawer, must honour a cheque upon proper presentation. Failure to do so can lead to the bank being liable to compensate the drawer for any loss or damage caused by such default.

Question 2: According to Section 31 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, if a drawee bank wrongfully dishonours a cheque despite having sufficient and properly applicable funds of the drawer, to whom is the bank primarily liable for compensation?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: C. The drawer of the cheque. In case of wrongful dishonour of a cheque, Section 31 specifies that the drawee bank must compensate the drawer for any loss or damage caused by such default. The liability is directly to the drawer, not typically to the payee or other holders, except in specific circumstances like the bank’s winding up or incorrect payment heedless of crossing.

Question 3: What condition must be met regarding the funds in a drawer’s account for a bank to be obligated to pay a cheque as per Section 31 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. The funds must be sufficient and properly applicable to the payment. For the bank’s duty to pay to arise, there must be an adequate credit balance in the customer’s account, or an overdraft facility, and these funds must be available for payment, meaning not subject to any lien or restraining order.

Question 4: Under what circumstance, relating to a cheque, does Section 31 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, specify that a drawee bank must pay?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. When duly required so to do. This implies that the cheque must be properly drawn, signed by the drawer, and presented in a valid manner for the bank’s obligation to pay to be triggered.

Question 5: What is meant by ‘payment in due course’ as defined in Section 10 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. Payment made in accordance with the apparent tenor of the instrument in good faith and without negligence. This means the payment aligns with what appears to be the drawer’s intention on the face of the instrument, made honestly and without carelessness, to a person in possession under circumstances that do not suggest they are not entitled to receive payment.

Question 6: According to the definition of ‘payment in due course’ in Section 10 of the NI Act, 1881, what is implied by ‘apparent tenor’?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. The payment should be in accordance with the intention of the drawer as it appears on the face of the instrument. This means the payment must align with the instructions visible on the cheque, and it cannot be made before the maturity date, nor can post-dated cheques be paid prematurely.

Question 7: For a paying banker to receive protection under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, when making payment of a cheque, what is a crucial condition related to their conduct as per Section 10?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. The payment must be made in good faith and without negligence. Section 10 offers no protection to a banker who acts dishonestly or carelessly, such as by failing to notice irregularities in endorsements.

Question 8: What condition regarding the recipient of the payment is stipulated for a payment to be considered ‘in due course’ under Section 10 of the NI Act, 1881?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. Payment should be made to any person in possession thereof, under circumstances which do not afford a reasonable ground for believing that he is not entitled to receive payment. This means that if circumstances suggest the possessor is not the rightful party (e.g., payment of the cheque has been stopped by the drawer), payment to such a person would not be ‘in due course’.

Question 9: What additional protection is provided to a paying banker by Section 85(1) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, concerning a cheque payable to order?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. Discharge by payment in due course even if the payee’s indorsement is forged. Section 85(1) protects a paying banker who makes payment in due course of an order cheque, even if an indorsement by or on behalf of the payee is subsequently found to be forged, as bankers cannot typically verify the signatures of payees or endorsers who are not their customers.

Question 10: According to Section 85(2) of the NI Act, 1881, what is the status of a drawee bank that makes payment in due course of a cheque originally expressed to be payable to bearer?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. The drawee is discharged, notwithstanding any indorsement (in full or blank) appearing thereon. For a cheque initially payable to bearer, payment in due course to the bearer discharges the bank, regardless of any subsequent indorsements, even if those indorsements attempt to restrict further negotiation.

Question 11: What is a key reason the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, provides protection to a paying banker against fraudulent indorsements under Section 85?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. Because paying bankers cannot ordinarily be expected to know the signatures of payees and various endorsers who are usually not their customers. This protection acknowledges the practical difficulty for a paying bank to verify the authenticity of every indorsement on an order cheque.

Question 12: In the context of ‘payment in due course’, if a bank pays an uncrossed order cheque over the counter based on an endorsement by a company’s manager using the company seal, and the manager was identified by a constituent of the bank, how might a court view the bank’s action if the manager acted fraudulently?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. The bank may be considered to have acted in good faith and without negligence if reasonable precautions were taken. If the bank took steps like verifying the company seal and the manager’s identity through a known constituent, it may be deemed to have acted without negligence, even if the endorsement was fraudulent, thus fulfilling a condition for ‘payment in due course’.

Question 13: What constitutes a ‘material alteration’ in a negotiable instrument, making it potentially null and void?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. An alteration that substantially changes the instrument or the liabilities of the parties to it. A material alteration is one that changes the ‘business effect’ or legal character of the instrument, regardless of whether it benefits or prejudices any party.

Question 14: Which of the following would generally be considered a material alteration to a cheque?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: C. Alteration of the amount payable. Changing the sum payable on a cheque is a very common form of fraudulent alteration and is considered material as it directly impacts the core obligation of the instrument.

Question 15: If a material alteration is made to a cheque, what should a banker ideally ensure before making payment?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. That the alteration is confirmed by the drawer’s signature or made with their consent/authority. To avoid issues with altered cheques, any material change should be authenticated by the drawer, typically by their signature next to the alteration.

Question 16: According to Section 89(1) of the NI Act, 1881, when is a paying banker discharged from liability if they pay a materially altered cheque?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. If the alteration is not apparent and payment is made according to the apparent tenor in due course. If an alteration is so skilfully made that it is not noticeable through ordinary diligence, and the bank pays the cheque as it appears, in good faith and without negligence, the bank is protected.

Question 17: If a cheque presented for payment does not appear to be crossed at the time of presentation, or seems to have had a crossing which has been obliterated, and the banker pays it according to its apparent tenor and in due course, what is the consequence under Section 89(1) of the NI Act, 1881?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. Such payment shall discharge the banker from all liability thereon. If the obliteration of a crossing is not apparent and the banker pays the cheque as if it were uncrossed, in due course, the banker is protected from liability.

Question 18: As per Section 89(2) of the NI Act, 1881, what constitutes a material alteration in the case of an electronic image of a truncated cheque?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. Any difference in the apparent tenor of such electronic image and the truncated cheque. Any discrepancy between how the cheque appears in its electronic form versus its original physical form (before truncation) is considered a material alteration.

Question 19: What is the duty of the bank or clearing house regarding the electronic image of a truncated cheque, as per Section 89(2) of the NI Act, 1881?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. To ensure the exactness of the apparent tenor of the electronic image while truncating and transmitting it. The responsibility lies with the bank or clearing house performing the truncation to make sure the electronic image accurately reflects the original cheque.

Question 20: According to Section 89(3) of the NI Act, 1881, what must a bank or clearing house do upon receiving a transmitted electronic image of a truncated cheque?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: C. Verify from the party who transmitted the image that the image so transmitted and received is exactly the same. This provision ensures a check for consistency and accuracy in the transmission process of truncated cheques.

Question 21: Who is defined as the ‘holder’ of a promissory note, bill of exchange, or cheque under Section 8 of the NI Act, 1881?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. Any person entitled in his own name to the possession thereof and to receive or recover the amount due thereon. This definition emphasizes the legal right to possess and claim the amount, not just physical possession. For instance, a finder of a lost instrument is not a holder.

Question 22: Can a person who obtains a negotiable instrument through forgery be considered a ‘holder’ under Section 8 of the NI Act, 1881?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: C. No, a person receiving an instrument through forgery or other fraudulent methods cannot be a holder. The entitlement in one’s own name and the right to recover the amount are crucial, which are absent in cases of forgery or fraud.

Question 23: Which of these conditions is NOT required for a person to be a ‘holder in due course’ under Section 9 of the NI Act, 1881?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. The person became the possessor after the amount mentioned in it became payable. A holder in due course must acquire the instrument before the amount mentioned in it became payable (i.e., before maturity).

Question 24: What is an essential characteristic of an instrument for a person to become a ‘holder in due course’ as per judicial interpretations?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. The instrument should be complete and regular when the holder takes possession. If an instrument is incomplete or irregular on its face when acquired, the acquirer may not qualify as a holder in due course. For example, an inchoate (incomplete) stamped instrument does not make one a holder in due course.

Question 25: When a bank, to oblige a customer, pays the amount of a cheque drawn on another bank before its collection, what is the position of the obliging bank?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. It becomes a holder for value. By giving value (paying the amount) for the cheque before it is cleared, the bank acquires the rights of a holder for value, which can be stronger than those of a mere collecting agent.

Question 26: What is the primary condition under which Section 131 of the NI Act, 1881, provides protection to a collecting banker?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. The banker must have acted in good faith and without negligence in receiving payment for a customer of a crossed cheque. This protection shields the collecting bank from liability to the true owner if the customer’s title to the crossed cheque proves defective, provided the bank acted honestly and carefully.

Question 27: Does the protection under Section 131 of the NI Act, 1881, apply if a collecting bank credits a customer’s account with the amount of a crossed cheque before receiving actual payment thereof?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. Yes, Explanation I to Section 131 clarifies that the banker is still deemed to receive payment for a customer in such a scenario. Giving immediate credit before collection does not, by itself, negate the protection, provided other conditions like good faith and absence of negligence are met.

Question 28: What duty is imposed by Explanation II to Section 131 of the NI Act, 1881, on a banker who receives payment based on an electronic image of a truncated cheque held with them?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. To verify the prima facie genuineness of the cheque to be truncated and any fraud, forgery, or tampering apparent on its face with due diligence and ordinary care. This places a responsibility on the collecting bank (or the bank truncating the cheque) to conduct initial checks for obvious issues before processing it through the image-based clearing system.

Question 29: Under Section 131A of the NI Act, 1881, the provisions related to the protection of a collecting banker (Chapter concerning Section 131) also apply to which other instrument as if it were a cheque?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: C. Any draft, as defined in Section 85-A. Section 131A extends the statutory protection available to collecting bankers for crossed cheques to also cover demand drafts.

Question 30: For a collecting banker to claim protection under Section 131 of the NI Act, 1881, for whose benefit must the collection be undertaken?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. Only for a person who is a customer of the bank and for whom all KYC guidelines have been complied with. The protection is available when the bank collects as an agent for its customer. Collecting for a non-customer or failing to adhere to KYC norms could jeopardise this protection.

Question 31: How many primary parties are typically involved in a promissory note?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. Two, the maker and the payee. A promissory note involves a person who makes the promise (maker) and a person to whom the promise to pay is made (payee).

Question 32: In a bill of exchange, how many distinct parties are generally named?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. Three, the drawer, the drawee, and the payee. A bill of exchange involves a drawer who issues the order, a drawee who is directed to pay, and a payee to whom the payment is to be made, though some of these roles can be held by the same person, reducing the minimum distinct individuals to two.

Question 33: Can a promissory note be made payable to the maker himself?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. No, a promissory note cannot be made payable to the maker himself. The nature of a promissory note is an undertaking to pay another person.

Question 34: What is the fundamental nature of the undertaking in a promissory note?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. An unconditional undertaking to pay. A promissory note contains a clear and absolute promise made by the maker to pay a certain sum of money.

Question 35: What is the nature of the instruction in a bill of exchange?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: C. An unconditional order to pay a certain sum of money. A bill of exchange is characterised by the drawer giving an unequivocal directive to the drawee to make a payment.

Question 36: Is prior acceptance required before payment of a promissory note?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. No, no prior acceptance is required before payment. The maker’s liability arises from the unconditional undertaking itself, without needing a separate acceptance step before the payment is due.

Question 37: When might acceptance be required for a bill of exchange before its due date for payment?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: C. Acceptance may be required before the due date of payment. Depending on the terms of the bill (e.g., if it’s payable after sight), the drawee may need to signify their assent to the order, known as acceptance, before the payment obligation matures.

Question 38: What is the nature of the maker’s responsibility in a promissory note?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: C. Primary and unconditional. The maker of a promissory note is the principal debtor, and their liability to pay is direct and not dependent on any other party’s default.

Question 39: What is the nature of the drawer’s liability in a bill of exchange?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. Secondary and conditional. The drawer’s liability on a bill of exchange typically arises if the drawee fails to accept or pay the bill, making it a secondary liability that is contingent upon such default.

Question 40: Is a ‘protest’ for dishonour a common requirement for a promissory note?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. No, protest is generally not required. Unlike certain situations with bills of exchange, formal protest for dishonour is not a standard prerequisite for enforcing a promissory note.

Question 41: In the event of dishonour of a bill of exchange, is the holder typically required to give notice of dishonour to the drawer?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. Yes, notice of dishonour is required by the holder to the drawer. To make the drawer liable, the holder must usually inform the drawer about the dishonour of the bill by the drawee/acceptor.

Question 42: On whom can a bill of exchange be drawn?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. It may be drawn on a person, firm, etc. A bill of exchange can be addressed to any entity capable of being a drawee, including individuals, partnerships, or companies, not just banks.

Question 43: On whom is a cheque always drawn?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. Always drawn on a Bank. A defining characteristic of a cheque is that it is an order addressed to a specific banker with whom the drawer maintains an account.

Question 44: Is acceptance a required step for a cheque?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: C. No, no acceptance is required for a cheque. Cheques are payable on demand and do not go through a formal acceptance process by the drawee bank in the way some bills of exchange do.

Question 45: How is a cheque typically made payable regarding its timing?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: A. Always payable on demand. A cheque is an instrument that instructs the bank to pay the specified sum immediately upon presentation, provided other conditions are met.

Question 46: Is a grace period applicable for the payment of cheques?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. No, no grace period is applicable for cheques. Cheques are payable on demand, and the concept of a grace period, which sometimes applies to bills of exchange, does not extend to cheques.

Question 47: Is notice of dishonour required for a cheque in the same way it is for a bill of exchange?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. Such notice (as typically required for bills to hold prior parties liable) is not required for cheques. While a cheque can be dishonoured, the formal notice requirements applicable to drawers and endorsers of bills of exchange are different for cheques; the primary recourse for dishonour of a cheque often involves specific statutory provisions.

Question 48: Can a bill of exchange be crossed like a cheque?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. No, the concept of crossing does not apply to bills of exchange. Crossing is a specific feature applicable to cheques to direct payment through a bank and not over the counter.

Question 49: Can a cheque be drawn payable to bearer?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. Yes, a cheque may be drawn payable to bearer. This means it is payable to whoever possesses the cheque, without needing an endorsement.

Question 50: Under what circumstances can the payment of a cheque be countermanded by the drawer?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. Payment may be countermanded by the drawer. The drawer of a cheque has the right to instruct their bank to stop payment on a cheque they have issued, provided the instruction is given before the cheque is paid.

Question 51: Who is referred to as the ‘drawer’ in the context of a bill of exchange or a cheque as per Section 7 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. The maker of a bill of exchange or cheque. The drawer is the individual or entity that creates and signs the instrument, thereby ordering the payment.

Question 52: Who is designated as the ‘drawee’ in a bill of exchange or cheque according to Section 7 of the NI Act, 1881?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. The person thereby directed to pay. The drawee is the party (often a bank in the case of a cheque, or another person/entity in a bill of exchange) that is ordered by the drawer to make the payment.

Question 53: What is a ‘drawee in case of need’ as defined in Section 7 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. A person named in the bill or indorsement to be resorted to if the original drawee does not pay or accept. This is a provision for an alternative person to approach for payment or acceptance if the primary drawee defaults.

Question 54: When does the drawee of a bill of exchange become an ‘acceptor’ as per Section 7 of the NI Act, 1881?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. After the drawee has signed his assent upon the bill and delivered it or given notice of such signing. Acceptance is the act by which the drawee signifies their agreement to the drawer’s order, thereby becoming primarily liable on the bill.

Question 55: Who is an ‘acceptor for honour’ according to Section 7 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. A person who accepts a bill that has been noted or protested for non-acceptance or for better security, supra protest for the honour of the drawer or an indorser. This is an intervention by a third party to prevent the bill from being dishonoured to protect the reputation of a party to the bill.

Question 56: Who is defined as the ‘payee’ in a negotiable instrument by Section 7 of the NI Act, 1881?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. The person named in the instrument, to whom or to whose order the money is by the instrument directed to be paid. The payee is the intended recipient of the funds as specified on the instrument.

Question 57: What is the fundamental obligation of a bank concerning cheques drawn by a customer, as outlined in Section 31 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. To honour (pay) the cheques, provided certain conditions are met. A bank has a duty to pay cheques drawn by its customer if there are sufficient funds properly applicable to the payment and the cheque is duly presented.

Question 58: What is the relationship between a banker and a customer when the bank is obliged to pay cheques drawn by the customer?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: C. Debtor and Creditor (banker as debtor, customer as creditor for the balance in account). When a customer deposits money, the bank becomes a debtor to the customer. The payment of a cheque is a discharge of this debt to the extent of the cheque amount.

Question 59: To whom does Section 31 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, specifically apply regarding the duty to pay cheques?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. To Banks only, acting as drawee of a cheque. This section imposes the statutory duty to honour cheques specifically upon bankers, as a cheque by definition (Section 6) is a bill of exchange drawn on a specified banker.

Question 60: What condition must be met regarding the availability of funds for a bank to be obligated to pay a customer’s cheque under Section 31, apart from sufficiency?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. The funds should be properly available and not earmarked or restrained by a court order. ‘Properly applicable’ means the funds are not encumbered by liens, garnishee orders, or other legal restrictions that prevent their use for paying the cheque.

Question 61: What defines a ‘material alteration’ in a negotiable instrument, irrespective of whether it benefits or prejudices the payee?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. An alteration that substantially alters the instrument and the liabilities of the parties to it. A material alteration is one that changes the fundamental legal nature or business effect of the instrument, or the rights and responsibilities of those involved.

Question 62: Which of the following changes to a negotiable instrument would be considered a material alteration?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. An alteration that changes the legal identity or character of the instrument. If a change makes the instrument speak a different language in legal terms than it originally did, or alters its essential nature or the relationship between the parties, it is deemed material.

Question 63: What is a potential consequence if a cheque presented for payment has a material alteration that is not authenticated by the drawer?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. The cheque may be declared null and void. A material alteration, unless consented to by all parties liable under the instrument or properly authenticated by the drawer, can invalidate the instrument, and a banker should be cautious about paying such a cheque.

Question 64: Which of these is an example of a material alteration that a banker should be particularly careful about?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: A. Alteration of the date of the instrument which might affect the time of payment. Changing the date can hasten or delay the payment date, which is a significant aspect of the instrument’s terms and thus constitutes a material alteration.

Question 65: If the name of the payee (beneficiary) on a cheque is changed without the drawer’s authentication, how is this generally viewed?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: C. As a material alteration. The identity of the payee is fundamental to an order instrument, and any unauthorized change to it substantially alters the drawer’s mandate.

Question 66: What is one of the most common forms of fraudulent alteration found in cheques?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. Alteration of the amount payable. Fraudulently changing the sum of money to be paid is a frequent and serious type of material alteration.

Question 68: Under Section 89(1) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, when is a banker discharged from liability if they pay an instrument that has been materially altered?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. Where the material alteration does not appear to have been so altered, and payment is made according to the apparent tenor in due course. If an alteration is not visible to the naked eye with ordinary diligence, the banker is protected if they pay the instrument as it appears to be, provided the payment is otherwise in due course.

Question 69: According to Section 89(1) of the NI Act, 1881, if a cheque is presented for payment which does not at the time of presentation appear to be crossed, or to have had a crossing which has been obliterated, how is the paying banker affected if they pay it according to the apparent tenor in due course?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. The banker shall be discharged from all liability thereon. If a crossing is not apparent (e.g., expertly obliterated) and the bank pays the cheque as if it were uncrossed, in good faith and without negligence, it is protected.

Question 70: What is considered a material alteration concerning an electronic image of a truncated cheque as per Section 89(2) of the NI Act, 1881?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. Any difference in apparent tenor of such electronic image and the truncated cheque. If the electronic representation of the cheque does not accurately reflect the details of the physical cheque as it was before truncation, this discrepancy is treated as a material alteration.

Question 71: What is the duty of the bank or clearing house under Section 89(2) of the NI Act, 1881, regarding the electronic image of a truncated cheque?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. To ensure the exactness of the apparent tenor of the electronic image while truncating and transmitting the image. The entity responsible for truncation must ensure that the electronic version is a faithful replica of the original cheque’s terms.

Question 72: As per Section 89(3) of the NI Act, 1881, what action is required by a bank or clearing house that receives a transmitted electronic image of a truncated cheque?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: C. To verify from the party who transmitted the image that the image so transmitted to it and received by it, is exactly the same. This is a step to ensure integrity and accuracy in the chain of transmission of the electronic image.

Question 73: Who is defined as the “holder” of a promissory note, bill of exchange, or cheque under Section 8 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. Any person entitled in his own name to the possession thereof and to receive or recover the amount due thereon from the parties thereto. This definition emphasizes the legal right to possess and claim payment, not merely physical possession. For example, a person who finds a lost bearer cheque is in possession but may not be entitled in their own name to recover the amount if the true owner is known.

Question 74: According to Section 9 of the NI Act, 1881, which of the following is a condition for a person to be a “holder in due course”?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. The person became the possessor of the instrument for consideration. To qualify as a holder in due course, the acquisition must be for value, among other conditions like acquiring before maturity and in good faith without notice of defect in title.

Question 75: For a person to be a “holder in due course” of a promissory note, bill of exchange, or cheque payable to order, what status must they hold if not the original payee?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. They must be an endorsee thereof. If an instrument is payable to order, subsequent holders who wish to be holders in due course must have acquired it through a valid chain of endorsements.

Question 76: What is a critical requirement concerning the state of a negotiable instrument when a person acquires it, for them to be considered a holder in due course?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. The instrument should be complete and regular on its face. Any apparent incompleteness or irregularity at the time of acquisition can prevent the acquirer from becoming a holder in due course.

Question 77: If a bank credits a customer’s account with the amount of a cheque drawn on another bank before collecting the funds, what is the bank’s position?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. The bank becomes a holder for value. By giving value (credit) to the customer before the cheque is cleared, the bank acquires rights similar to one who has paid consideration for the instrument.

Question 78: Under Section 131 of the NI Act, 1881, what is a prerequisite for a collecting banker to claim statutory protection if the title to a cheque proves defective?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. The banker must have received payment for a customer of a cheque crossed generally or specially to himself, in good faith and without negligence. Protection is afforded when the bank collects a crossed cheque for its customer, acting honestly and with due care.

Question 79: Does a collecting banker lose the protection under Section 131 if they credit the customer’s account with the amount of a crossed cheque before receiving the actual payment thereof?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. No, Explanation I to Section 131 clarifies that this action does not, by itself, negate the protection. The bank is still considered to be receiving payment for the customer even if it gives provisional credit.

Question 80: What specific duty does Explanation II to Section 131 impose on a banker receiving payment based on an electronic image of a truncated cheque held with them?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. To verify the prima facie genuineness of the cheque to be truncated and any fraud, forgery or tampering apparent on the face of the instrument that can be verified with due diligence and ordinary care. This places a responsibility on the collecting bank to check for obvious issues before truncation.

Question 81: To what other instrument do the provisions of Section 131 (protection to collecting banker) apply, as if it were a cheque, according to Section 131A?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: C. Any draft, as defined in Section 85-A. This extends the protection offered for collecting crossed cheques to the collection of demand drafts as well.

Question 82: For a collecting bank to successfully claim protection under Section 131, for whom must the cheque be collected?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. For a person who is a customer of the bank, with KYC guidelines complied with. The bank must be acting as an agent for its own customer in the collection process, and adherence to customer due diligence norms is important.

Question 83: What is the potential penal consequence for a person whose cheque is returned unpaid due to insufficient funds or exceeding an arranged limit, under Section 138 of the NI Act, 1881?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. Imprisonment for a term which may be extended to two years, or with fine which may extend to twice the amount of the cheque, or with both. Section 138 introduces criminal liability for the dishonour of cheques under specified conditions.

Question 84: What is the maximum period within which a cheque must be presented to the bank from its date of drawing, for the provisions of Section 138 (dishonour of cheque) to apply?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. Within a period of six months from the date on which it is drawn or within the period of its validity, whichever is earlier. (Note: Current RBI guidelines prescribe a three-month validity). The statutory provision mentions six months, but prevailing regulatory directives on cheque validity (currently three months as of the knowledge cut-off for this document) would also be key.

Question 85: Within how many days of receiving information from the bank about the return of a cheque as unpaid must the payee or holder in due course make a demand for payment in writing to the drawer, under Section 138?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: C. Within thirty days. The payee/holder has thirty days from the receipt of the dishonour memo to issue a legal notice demanding payment from the drawer.

Question 86: If the drawer fails to make payment within how many days of the receipt of the notice (demanding payment for a dishonoured cheque) can the payee initiate proceedings under Section 138?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. Within fifteen days. The drawer is given a period of fifteen days from receiving the demand notice to make the payment; failure to do so gives rise to the cause of action for the payee/holder.

Question 87: What is the presumption under Section 139 of the NI Act, 1881, regarding a cheque received by the holder?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. It shall be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, that the holder of a cheque received it for the discharge, in whole or in part, of any debt or other liability. This places an initial burden on the drawer to prove that the cheque was not issued for a legally enforceable debt or liability.

Question 88: If an offence under Section 138 is committed by a company, who, besides the company, shall be deemed guilty of the offence under Section 141?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. Every person who, at the time the offence was committed, was in charge of, and was responsible to, the company for the conduct of its business. This extends liability to individuals managing the company’s affairs, subject to certain defences.

Question 89: Under Section 142(1)(a) of the NI Act, 1881, who can make a written complaint for an offence punishable under Section 138?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: C. The payee or, as the case may be, the holder in due course of the cheque. Cognizance of the offence can only be taken upon a complaint filed by the person entitled to receive the cheque amount.

Question 90: What is the time limit for making a complaint under Section 138, as per Section 142(1)(b) of the NI Act, 1881?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. Within one month of the date on which the cause of action arises under clause (c) of the proviso to Section 138. The cause of action arises after the drawer fails to make payment within 15 days of receiving the demand notice.

Question 91: According to Section 142(2)(a) of the NI Act, 1881, if a cheque is delivered for collection through an account, where shall the offence under Section 138 be inquired into and tried?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: C. By a court within whose local jurisdiction the branch of the bank where the payee or holder in due course maintains the account, is situated. This provision specifies the territorial jurisdiction for filing complaints related to cheque dishonour when collected through an account.

Question 92: Under Section 143A of the NI Act, 1881, what is the maximum interim compensation that a Court trying an offence under Section 138 may order the drawer to pay to the complainant?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. Twenty per cent of the amount of the cheque. The court has the power to direct the drawer to pay interim compensation, but it cannot exceed this percentage of the cheque amount.

Question 93: As per Section 143A(3), within what period must the interim compensation be paid from the date of the court’s order, unless extended?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. Within sixty days. The drawer is required to pay the interim compensation within 60 days, though the court may grant an extension of up to 30 additional days on sufficient cause shown.

Question 94: If the drawer of the cheque is acquitted in a case under Section 138, what direction shall the Court give regarding any interim compensation paid by the drawer under Section 143A?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. The Court shall direct the complainant to repay to the drawer the amount of interim compensation, with interest at the bank rate. This provision ensures restitution if the drawer is found not guilty.

Question 95: According to Section 148(1) of the NI Act, 1881, in an appeal by the drawer against conviction under Section 138, what minimum amount may the Appellate Court order the appellant (drawer) to deposit?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. Twenty per cent of the fine or compensation awarded by the trial Court. This provision empowers the appellate court to require a deposit from the convicted drawer as a condition for the appeal, with the minimum set at 20%.

Question 96: In which of the following situations is a person NOT considered the holder of a cheque?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: B. Mr. Y finds a bearer cheque lying on the road. A finder of a lost bearer cheque, while in physical possession, is not entitled to it in their own name if the true owner can be found; a holder must be entitled to possession in their own name and to receive or recover the amount.

Question 97: Which of these is NOT a necessary condition for a person to be recognised as a ‘holder in due course’ of a cheque?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: C. The cheque must be a crossed cheque. While crossing affects how a cheque can be paid, it is not a prerequisite for a person to attain the status of a holder in due course. The other conditions relate to consideration, acquisition before maturity, and good faith regarding title.

Question 98: What circumstances generally indicate that a ‘material alteration’ has occurred in a negotiable instrument?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: D. All of the above conditions indicate a material alteration. A material alteration is one that substantially changes the instrument’s terms, its legal effect, or the rights and obligations of the parties to it.

Question 99: Which one of the following actions is NOT considered an example of a material alteration that would typically necessitate a banker to refuse payment of a cheque?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: C. Converting a bearer cheque into an order cheque by striking out “or bearer” and adding a payee’s name, if done by the holder to safeguard it. While this changes the character, some alterations are permissible or do not void the instrument. However, converting an order cheque to bearer is usually material. The question asks what is not an example necessitating refusal; converting bearer to order is sometimes seen as less problematic than other alterations if done by a lawful holder for safety, though bank policies may still require drawer confirmation. Given the options, overwriting dates, obliterating crossings, and altering amounts are more definitive material alterations leading to refusal if unauthenticated.

Question 100: When a bank is in the process of paying a cheque presented for payment, which will result in a debit from the savings bank account of its customer, what is the fundamental relationship existing between the banker and the customer in this transaction?

Show Explanation

Correct Answer: C. Debtor (the bank) and Creditor (the customer). When a customer deposits funds into their account, the bank becomes a debtor to the customer for that amount. Paying a cheque is essentially the bank (debtor) repaying a portion of that debt to the order of the customer (creditor).

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top